19 Ind. App. 377 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1898
— The complaint of the appellants against the appellee contained three paragraphs, a demurrer to each of which for want of sufficient facts was sustained. Counsel present for our consideration the question as to the sufficiency of the third paragraph, in which it was, in substance, alleged that the appellee, an incorporated mutual benefit society with subordinate lodges under its jurisdiction, had a
It wras alleged that at the time the intestate became a member of Thisbe Lodge, and at the time of his admission to membership in the lodge, and at the time of his election to become a participating member of the endowment fund, said lodge did not keep a book in the lodge room, with the names and ages of all its participating members, each on a separate page, and did not at that time have in the lodge room a designated book such as is required under said section 13; that at that time, though requesting the privilege of carrying out the obligation on his part to make the declaration as provided in said section 10, he was, on account of the failure of said lodge, prevented from making his declaration as to his beneficiary or beneficiaries under said section 10; that said failure on the part of the lodge consisted in the negligence of its officers and custodians in not having present in the lodge room the declaration book provided for by said section 10, and in not having it then and there accessible to newly-elected members and to the intestate; that at the time he elected to become a member entitled to the endowment, he asked to be allowed to make his designation as provided in the law of the order, and was told that the designation book was not then in the lodge room, but was told
It will be observed that it is not shown in the complaint that the intestate had the qualification in respect to age to become a participating member of the endowment fund. This may have been an inadvertent omission of the pleader. Though it is alleged that the intestate left no wife or children, and made no' valid declaration of beneficiaries, yet the complaint proceeds, not upon a claim that the appellants are entitled to share in the fund as heirs at law of the intestate, but upon the theory that he made a sufficient designation of the appellants as beneficiaries. If it can be said that the oral designation alleged to have been made by him amounted to such an indication “to which member or members of his family” the money should be paid at his demise that it would have been a valid declaration if made in a mode prescribed by the endowment law of the order, — as to