History
  • No items yet
midpage
Loayza v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
254 A.D. 577
N.Y. App. Div.
1938
Check Treatment

— Order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, vacate the judgment, and grant a new trial, reversed on the law *578and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. We accept the version of defendant’s counsel that the juror failed to acquaint him with the information that, at the time he wás accepted as a juror, there wás then pending in the same Court an action by his wife against this defendant. In the interest of substantial justice there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [See unte, p. 577.]

Case Details

Case Name: Loayza v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 18, 1938
Citation: 254 A.D. 577
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.