633 So. 2d 1205 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1994
After violating his probation, Lloyd was sentenced at one sentencing hearing on both the original offense (lower court case number 91-11437) and on the new substantive offenses which constituted the violation (lower court case number 92-7140). In case number 91-11437, Lloyd received a departure sentence in excess of the one-cell bump-up permitted by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court could have
We ñnd no merit in Lloyd’s second claim that the lower court committed reversible error in excluding a juror for cause in case no. 92-7140.
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.
. Snead v. State, 616 So.2d 964 (Fla.1993); Williams v. State, 581 So.2d 144 (Fla.1991).