Lloyd v. New York State Division of ParoleLloyd v. New York State Division of Parole
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The respondents have advised this Court that the petitioner is now being held on the basis of a subsequent determination denying parole which followed another hearing. The present appeal is therefore academic (see, e.g., Matter of Bates v Russi,
Were we to reach the merits of the appeal, we would affirm the judgment appealed from since the petitioner has "failed to rebut the presumption that the parole board complied with statutory requirements” (Matter of Lee v Russi, supra, at 720, citing Executive Law § 259-i; Matter of McLain v New York State Div. of Parole,