History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lloyd v. Lloyd
60 Vt. 288
Vt.
1888
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Powers, J.

The plaintiff suffered damage by the wrongful obstruction of his drain. “He might have gone on and sunk the new drain made by the defendants as aforesaid below the outlet of the covered drain at an expense not exceeding $25,” says the referee.

Without taking this precaution he was damaged $100. Which sum is recoverable upon the facts stated in the report? for it is clear that a liability is established.

The general rule is that a plaintiff, suffering damages by the fault of the defendant, may recover the full amount of his damage. But this rule is modified, if the plaintiff’s negligence or misconduct has aggravated or increased such damage..

It is the duty of a person injured by the fault of another to úse all reasonable means to protect himself against injurious consequences. If injured in his person he must attend to his cure. If injured in his estate he must attend to its preservation. If he fails in this duty he cannot gather the fruits of his own negligence.

The plaintiff could have indemnified himself at an expense of $25.00, and this is the legal measure of his damage. Bardwell v. Jamaica, 15 Vt. 438.

Judgment reversed and judgment on the report for the plaintiff for $25.00, and interest from filing of report.

Case Details

Case Name: Lloyd v. Lloyd
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Jan 15, 1888
Citation: 60 Vt. 288
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.