History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lloyd v. H. T. E. Beardsley, Inc.
258 A.D. 954
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment

The petitioner previously instituted a derivative stockholder’s action in which he moved for discovery of the corporate books and was granted such examination, which was limited in, scope *955because of his alleged position as a competitor in business of the company. Under the circumstances, an order in the nature of mandamus for a further inspection of the books by petitioner as a stockholder was improperly granted. Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Lloyd v. H. T. E. Beardsley, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 26, 1940
Citation: 258 A.D. 954
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.