History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lloyd v. Calhoun
82 Wash. 35
Wash.
1914
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

*36On Rehearing.

Main, J.

The report of the majority department opinion in this case, as well as the dissent thereto, may be found in 78 Wash. 438, 139 Pac. 231. A rehearing was granted and the cause was reargued. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the action must be dismissed. Since the reasons why the action cannot be maintained are sufficiently stated in the dissenting opinion -above referred to, there seems no reason for further elaboration. It is sufficient to say that we concur in the views therein expressed, and for the reasons there given, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with direction to dismiss.

Crow, C. J., Gose, Chadwick, Ellis, and Morris, JJ., concur.






Dissenting Opinion

Fullerton, Mount, and Parker, JJ.

(dissenting) — We are unable to conclude that the department decision here overruled is erroneous, and for that reason dissent from the judgment directed to be entered.

Case Details

Case Name: Lloyd v. Calhoun
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 8, 1914
Citation: 82 Wash. 35
Docket Number: No. 11566
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.