History
  • No items yet
midpage
Litvin v. State
639 So. 2d 71
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion of December 22, 1993, and substitute the following opinion:

We affirm the trial court order denying post-conviction relief in all respects except with regard to the computation of gain time concerning which the state acknowledges error. Upon sentencing following a violation of probation, Appellant was entitled to a credit *72for time served, including earned gain time. The Appellant was initially incarcerated prior to October 1, 1989. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 627 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Jean v. State, 627 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Springer v. State, 626 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The record reflects that Appellant is entitled to a credit of four years served in prison .plus 312 days in jail.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Litvin v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 18, 1994
Citation: 639 So. 2d 71
Docket Number: No. 93-3443
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.