History
  • No items yet
midpage
Little v. Upham
8 A. 823
| N.H. | 1886
|
Check Treatment

The objection that a verdict is against the evidence presents no question of law. It is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Fuller v. Bailey, 58 N.H. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, 58 N.H. 125; Kelley v. Woodward,58 N.H. 153; Hovey v. Brown, 59 N.H. 114.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Little v. Upham
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1886
Citation: 8 A. 823
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.