109 Iowa 47 | Iowa | 1899
The judgment sought to be enjoined was rendered May 26, 1882, and a transcript filed with the clerk of the district court April 28, 1886. An execution issued in July, 1896, and was levied on the plaintiff’s land. The judgment recites that the justice delivered the original notice
I. The residence of the parties in the absence of any, showing to the contrary, is presumed, to have been such as to confer jurisdiction of jthe subject-matter. Under section entered
II. The statement that the notice was received the day after it was served does not warrant the conclusion that service was made from a copy. The exact date of its receipt
III. The vice of the appellant’s argument on the constitutionality of the provision of the statute relating to the enforcement of a justice’s judgment after transcript has been filed in the district court lies in the assumption that the