History
  • No items yet
midpage
Litman v. Litman
61 N.Y.2d 918
NY
1984
Check Treatment

*920 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Case Details

Case Name: Litman v. Litman
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 20, 1984
Citation: 61 N.Y.2d 918
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.