midpage

Litman v. LitmanLitman v. Litman

New York Court of Appeals
Mar 20, 1984
Versions:61 N.Y.2d 918
463 N.E.2d 34
474 N.Y.S.2d 718
1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4165

*920 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Case Details

Case Name: Litman v. Litman
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 20, 1984
Citations: 61 N.Y.2d 918; 463 N.E.2d 34; 474 N.Y.S.2d 718; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4165
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In