LITIGAIDE, INC. v. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT.
No. 95-2002
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Submitted April 15, 1996—Decided May 29, 1996.
75 Ohio St.3d 508 | 1996-Ohio-205
IN MANDAMUS.
Mandamus to compel Custodian of Records for Lakewood Police Department to provide requested police report and to enjoin the custodian from requiring persons requesting public records to provide personal information prior to being afforded access to the records—Cause dismissed, when.
{¶ 1} Relator, Litigaide, Inc. (“Litigaide“), provides litigation support services to attorneys and other clients. In August 1995, Litigaide‘s sole employee, Randall G. Buckosh, requested a copy of a police report from respondent, Custodian of Records for Lakewood Police Department. After respondent refused Litigaide‘s request, Litigaide instituted this action for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to provide the requested police report and to enjoin respondent from requiring persons requesting public records to provide personal information prior to being afforded access to records.
Debra J. Dixon, for relator.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Albert J. Lucas and Stanley J. Dobrowski; and Michael E. Murman, Lakewood Director of Law, for respondent.
Per Curiam.
{¶ 2} Litigaide‘s action is subject to dismissal for the following reasons. Litigaide failed to comply with
{¶ 3} In addition, to the extent that Litigaide requests injunctive relief, its claim must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. State ex rel. Governor v. Taft (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 1, 3, 640 N.E.2d 1136, 1137-1138.
Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.
