Listopad v. Sherwood Equities, Inc.Listopad v. Sherwood Equities, Inc.
As there is no evidence linking defendants to the plastic sheeting that allegedly caused plaintiff‘s fall, a jury would be left to base its verdict on speculation, rather than logical inferences (Schneider v Kings Highway Hosp. Ctr., 67 NY2d 743, 744 [1986]).
The court properly declined to consider plaintiff‘s supplemental bill of particulars alleging for the first time that her fall was caused by poor lighting (see Boland v Koppelman, 251 AD2d 176 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.