Lister v. Lister

66 N.J. Eq. 434 | N.J. | 1904

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery filed in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Jus tice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green — 11.

For reversal — None.