Lister v. Lister
66 N.J. Eq. 434
N.J.
1904
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery filed in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Jus tice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green — 11.

For reversal — None.