History
  • No items yet
midpage
Liquidation of New York Agency of Bank of Credit & Commerce International v. Superintendent of Banks
642 N.Y.S.2d 238
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered December 14, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate a default judgment dismissing his complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), since plaintiff failed to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action. The contract plaintiff signed was silent as to the duration of employment and did not place any limitation on the defendant employer’s right of termination, and it was therefore one of employment at-will (see, Sabetay v Sterling Drug, 69 NY2d 329, 333). The written contract precludes plaintiff from asserting the parol evidence of oral assurances of lifetime employment allegedly made by defendant (see, Diskin v Consolidated Edison Co., 135 AD2d 775, 777, lv denied 72 NY2d 802; Frishberg v Esprit de Corp., 778 F Supp 793, 802, affd 969 F2d 1042). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Liquidation of New York Agency of Bank of Credit & Commerce International v. Superintendent of Banks
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 7, 1996
Citation: 642 N.Y.S.2d 238
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In