History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lippert v. Engle
52 Ohio St. 2d 67
Ohio
1977
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lippert v. Engle
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 16, 1977
Citation: 52 Ohio St. 2d 67
Docket Number: No. 77-634
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.