History
  • No items yet
midpage
Linsley v. Keys & Williams
5 Johns. 123
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1809
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The warrant under which the defendant / . offered to justify, was sufficiently set forth m the last branch of the notice, to entitle the defendants to offer it in evidence. It was not requisite to have stated in the notice, the cause of action, for which the warrant was issued. In Belli v. Broadbent andwz/e, (3 Term Rep. 183.) the cause of action was not set forth, in a special plea of justification, under mesne process, and yet the plea was held good. The verdict must, therefore,, beset aside, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Rule granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Linsley v. Keys & Williams
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1809
Citation: 5 Johns. 123
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.