Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

95 N.J. Eq. 265 | N.J. | 1923

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bentley in the court of chancery.

For affirmance■—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Minturn, Kaliscii, Heppeniibimer—3.