History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lingerman v. Nave
31 Ind. 222
Ind.
1869
Check Treatment
Elliott, C. J.

Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.

The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Lingerman v. Nave
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1869
Citation: 31 Ind. 222
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.