History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lindsey v. . Sanderlin
104 N.C. 331
N.C.
1889
Check Treatment

The argument of the plaintiff's counsel was addressed to the general character of his Honor's charge in reference to negligence. We regret that we are precluded from passing upon that question. There is not only a failure to assign error (see McKinnin v. Morrison, post, 354, and Carltonv. R. R., post, 365), but the case expressly states that the instructions given were not excepted to.

The judgment therefore must be

Affirmed.

Cited: Barber v. Buffaloe, 122 N.C. 131.

(332)

Case Details

Case Name: Lindsey v. . Sanderlin
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1889
Citation: 104 N.C. 331
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.