History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lindley v. State
55 S.W.2d 846
Tex. Crim. App.
1932
Check Treatment
MORROW, P. J.

The prosecution is apparently based upon article 1056, P. C. 1925, and charges that the appellant unlawfully and intentionally diverted natural gas from the pipe lines of R. L. Pearcy.

The penalty allowed by statute is not less than $25 nor more than $100. The penalty assessed in the present instance is a fine of $25. The prosecution originated in the justice court and was appealed' to the county court. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Such is the declaration of article 53, C. C. P. 1925. See, also, Ragsdale v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 278.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lindley v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 21, 1932
Citation: 55 S.W.2d 846
Docket Number: No. 15762
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.