238 N.W. 231 | Mich. | 1931
Brochu Hass, employer, and General Casualty Surety Company, insurer, defendants, *235 appeal from the award of the department of labor and industry, to John Lindhout, employee and plaintiff, for the loss of an eye. A piece of steel, chipped from a hammer, penetrated the cornea of the plaintiff's eye while he was at work at his trade of tool and die maker, and was removed with a magnet. A cataract developed and was subsequently removed by an operation. The eyesight of the injured eye was destroyed, but with the use of a proper lens the vision was restored and increased about 25 per cent. Without the use of glasses, however, the vision of the injured eye is dim, and useless for industrial purposes, but for other uses sufficient to "see large objects at the sides and up and down."
The facts in the case are very similar to those inSuggs v. Ternstedt Manfg. Co.,
"The cases display considerable variety and divergency, but we are not called upon to reconcile them. It may be noted that, except in the Collins Case, where the board held that the injury to the remaining eye had caused total disability and was compensable as such under the general provisions of the statute, the decisions of the compensation board on loss of an eye have been uniformly affirmed by this court. The application of the test to a specific case is very largely a question of fact upon which the finding of the board is conclusive, if supported by evidence. Liimatta v. Calumet Hecla Mining Co.,
The instant case, as we stated in the Powers Case, "presents an issue of fact upon which the decision of the board is final." The award is affirmed, with costs.
WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. *237