Lind v. SepulvedaLind v. Sepulveda
Respondent appeals from an order which committed him to jail for his willful failure to pay child support. His counsel seeks to be relieved of representing him, arguing that no nonfrivolous appellate issues exist. Respondent has already served his jail sentence and solely appealed from the order of commitment. Accordingly, respondent‘s appeal has been rendered moot and must be dismissed, and there is no need to consider counsel‘s request
Mercure, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.