LINCOLN PLACE, LLC, Plaintiff, v RVP CONSULTING, INC., et al., Defendants. ROBERT PETERS et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs--Appellants, v MICHAEL E. PEKOFSKY, ESQ., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
February 2, 2010
70 AD3d 594, 896 NYS2d 47
Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.
The third-party complaint alleging legal malpractice is time-barred, the action having been commenced more than three years after the malpractice was committed (
Contrary to Peters’s contention, an adjudication of the meaning of Pekofsky’s 1997 letter was not a prerequisite to the existence of an actionable injury. Indeed, while Peters may not have been aware until 2001 or 2002 that Pekofsky’s actions could result in liability, it is not the date on which Peters learned that malpractice had occurred, but the date on which the malpractice was committed, that is relevant (West Vil. Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v Balber Pickard Battistoni Maldonado & Ver Dan Tuin, PC, 49 AD3d 270, 270 [2008]). Peters’s subjective belief that Pekofsky had designated a lessee rather than assigning the
