History
  • No items yet
midpage
Linch v. Pittsburgh Traction Co.
153 Pa. 102
Pa.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

Each of the defendant’s points referred to in the specifications of error involved a binding instruction in its favor. This the learned judge below could not have properly given in view of the evidence. We do not think it was a case that could have been withdrawn from the jury. A discussion of the evidence is unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Linch v. Pittsburgh Traction Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 1893
Citation: 153 Pa. 102
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 57
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.