History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lilly v. Prudential Insurance
587 A.2d 629
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division which declared that plaintiff Marilyn R. Lilly was entitled to personal injury protection benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant Prudential Insurance Company (more properly referred to as Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company) is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Menza in his written opinion which is reported as Lilly v. Prudential Insurance Company, 246 N.J.Super. 357, 587 A.2d 672 (Law Div.1990).

Case Details

Case Name: Lilly v. Prudential Insurance
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jan 18, 1991
Citation: 587 A.2d 629
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In