History
  • No items yet
midpage
Likay v. Gottesman
235 A.D. 858
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

—Motion for reargument granted. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ. [See ante,"p. 820.] On reargument, order appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion to punish for contempt of court denied without prejudice to renewal. The Special Term was without power to punish defendants for contempt by fine or imprisonment without proof of personal service of the order directing discovery and inspection. On further consideration we think the answers of the defendants should not be struck out. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Likay v. Gottesman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 858
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.