History
  • No items yet
midpage
Likay v. Gottesman
235 A.D. 820
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

Order modified by striking out the provision adjudging defendants Gottesman and Weiss in contempt and directing their imprisonment, and by adding thereto the provision *821that their answers be struck out because of their disobedience of the order of discovery and inspection. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal of the application to punish for contempt upon service of the order of discovery and inspection on these defendants personally. The Special Term was without power to punish the defendants for contempt by imprisonment or fine without proof of personal service of the order directing discovery and inspection. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Likay v. Gottesman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 820
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.