History
  • No items yet
midpage
Liechty v. Taft
255 A.D. 751
N.Y. App. Div.
1938
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff sues for services performed and materials furnished in the construction, for defendant, of a house in Broome county. The contract was made and all the transactions between the parties took place in Broome county. Plaintiff and his material witnesses, consisting of his wife, a relative in his employ and two expert witnesses, reside in Oneida county where this action was commenced. Defendant’s material witnesses, consisting of his wife, two clerks in his employ and three carpenters, two of whom have examined the house and submitted bids for its completion, all reside in Broome county. Under such circumstances, the action should be tried in Broome county. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion for change of venue.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Liechty v. Taft
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 28, 1938
Citation: 255 A.D. 751
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.