History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lieberman v. Segal
242 A.D. 693
N.Y. App. Div.
1934
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, *694Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., dissent and vote for reversal and for a new trial. The Brooklyn Trust Company, collecting agent for plaintiff, was entitled to give notice of dishonor. (West River Bank v. Taylor, 34 N. Y. 128.) If the party giving notice of dishonor knew Aaron Segal, the indorser, was dead, notice of dishonor should have been given to the executors of his estate, who had qualified a long time before presentment for payment of the note. If the party giving notice did not know of his death, notice might be sent, addressed to Aaron Segal at his last known address. Plaintiff failed to prove that the party giving notice of dishonor did not know of Aaron Segal’s death. If the party giving notice knew of Aaron Segal’s death, notice of dishonor given to Morris Segal, the maker, as an individual, was not notice to him as an executor of the estate of Aaron Segal. (3 R. C. L. 1231.) Notice to an executor is to advise him that the holder will look to the estate for payment. Notice to the maker as an individual who happens to be an executor does not serve that purpose.

Case Details

Case Name: Lieberman v. Segal
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 15, 1934
Citation: 242 A.D. 693
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.