History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lichten v. Texas
393 U.S. 86
SCOTUS
1968
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.

Case Details

Case Name: Lichten v. Texas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 9, 1968
Citation: 393 U.S. 86
Docket Number: 414
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.