History
  • No items yet
midpage
Licardo v. Licardo
226 A.D. 706
N.Y. App. Div.
1929
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, and judgment directed thereon, with costs, on the ground that the verdict is justified and sustained by the evidence. (Leversee v. Neidermyer, 219 App. Div. 214; Hogan v. Franken, 221 id. 164.) Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hasbrouck, J., dissent on the ground that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial justice.

Case Details

Case Name: Licardo v. Licardo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1929
Citation: 226 A.D. 706
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.