History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lewis v. State
593 So. 2d 1195
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Carl Lewis appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a *1196convicted felon. He claims that he should have been allowed to “back strike” a prospective juror. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.

At trial, the judge announced that the parties would proceed to exercise their challenges to jurors until there was a “double pass.” The state excused one juror, appellant excused another, the state excused another, appellant passed, the state passed, and appellant attempted to excuse another juror. The trial judge, however, would not allow appellant to excuse any more jurors because there had been a “double pass.” Appellant timely objected to the trial court’s refusal to excuse the challenged juror.

A defendant may challenge a prospective juror at anytime before the jury is sworn. Fla.Crim.P. 3.310. Until the jury is sworn, a trial court cannot infringe upon a defendant’s right to challenge any juror, either peremptorily or for cause. Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098, 1099 (Fla.1987). To deny a defendant this right is per se reversible error. Id.

In light of our holding, we consider the remaining issues to be moot.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lewis v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 19, 1992
Citation: 593 So. 2d 1195
Docket Number: No. 91-0648
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.