Dеfendant Norman Lewis was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life in prison. 1 He appeals, enumerating error оn the general grounds and the trial court’s refusal to allow evidence of the victim’s prior violent acts. We affirm.
Viewing the evidencе in a light favorable to the jury’s finding of
*84
guilt,
Eagle v. State,
Defendant bought a one-way bus ticket to Cordele. He visited with his nieсe and took a butcher knife from her kitchen. He asked his family to fоrgive him for what he was about to do. When he spotted Williams walking down the street, he chased her, stabbed her in the back, and stabbed her mаny more times after she fell to the ground.
Defendant walked to a church, went inside, and told a déacon he had stabbed someone. Following his arrest, defendant made a full confession, saying he went to Cordele to kill Williams. Defendant added that he wanted, but was unable, to kill himsеlf; and that he wanted to be put to death without a trial.
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt.
Jackson v. Virginia,
2. Defеndant asserts the trial court erred in refusing to permit defendant to introduce evidence demonstrating that sometime between February and March 1995, Williams stabbed him on two occasions, once with a knife, and once with a screwdriver; that Williams threatened to kill him almost every day during that same time period; and that Williams threw boiling water on him on October 19, 1991. We disagree.
Although a defendant can introduce еvidence of a victim’s prior acts of violence,
Chandler v. State,
Even if it could be said that evidence of Williams’ prior acts
*85
should have been admitted, ány error in this regard wаs harmless. After all, the evidence against defendant was overwhеlming. Moreover, although other witnesses were not permitted to testify about Williams’ prior acts, defendant testified about them without objection. Thus, it is highly probable that any error in this regard did not contribute to the verdict.
Johnson v. State,
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
Defеndant killed the victim on March 20, 1995. He was indicted and charged with malicе murder on May 8, 1995. The trial began on August 22, 1995; defendant was found guilty on August 23,1995; he was sentenced that same day. Defendant’s timely filed motion for a new trial wаs denied on December 18,1996. Defendant filed a notice of aрpeal on January 7, 1997. The appeal was docketed in this Cоurt on January 30,1997, and submitted for decision on briefs on March 24, 1997.
We note that defendant did not claim that he suffered from battered person syndrome. See generally
Chester v. State,
