History
  • No items yet
midpage
17 Vet. App. 75
Vet. App.
2003

Lead Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On January 7, 2003, the Court granted, in part, the appellant’s application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. On February 12, 2003, the Court granted the appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a motion pursuant to Rule 35 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. On March 5, 2003, the appellant filed a motion for a decision by a panel. On March 13, 2003, he filed a motion for a stay pending the resolution of Abbey v. Principi, No. 01-501. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for a decision by a panel is denied.






Dissenting Opinion

STEINBERG, Judge,

dissenting:

For the following reasons, I voted to grant the appellant’s March 5, 2003, motion for a panel decision: (1) I believe that the additional evidence (at least five affidavits are new) submitted by the appellant in his motion for a panel decision (Motion at 7-8, Attachments A-E) warrants the panel’s consideration and (2) in the pending case of Abbey v. Principi, No. 01-501, the Court issued an order directing the appellant there to file a memorandum “that explains why the prevailing market rate in this ease should not be $90 per hour”, Abbey v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 543, 544 (2002) (per curiam order), and I believe that a similar order should be issued in the instant case. Hence, I also vote to grant the appellant’s March 13, 2003, motion for a stay pending the resolution of Abbey, supra.

Case Details

Case Name: Lewis v. Principi
Court Name: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Date Published: Apr 24, 2003
Citations: 17 Vet. App. 75; 2003 WL 1923778; 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 317; 01-211
Docket Number: 01-211
Court Abbreviation: Vet. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In