87 Ga. 466 | Ga. | 1891
The facts of this case will be found reported in the case of Lewis v. Armstrong, 80 Ga. 402. The decision as announced in that case covers all the points of law made in the present bill of exceptions, and they are res adjudicata so far as the present case is concerned. At the conclusion of the opinion the following direction was given : “ The court should ascertain upon the next trial the amount of Ray’s property that was subject to this judgment and execution, and determine how much thereof was released by the plaintiff, and credit whatever amount was released to the heirs of Lewis.”
The court, on the last trial, undertook to carry out this direction, but erred in crediting to the Lewises the amount only which Ray’s property brought at the ad
This evidence shows that the real value of the i’eal estate was much more than the widow gave for it at the
Judgment reversed on the main hill of exceptions, and affirmed as to the cross-hill.