History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lewis v. Clarke
148 N.Y.S. 1126
N.Y. App. Div.
1914
Check Treatment

Order and interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements, but with leave to defendants within twenty days after entry of the order herein to withdraw such demurrer and answer the complaint, upon payment of the costs awarded at the Special Term and upon this appeal. While the complaint may not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the former mayor, it does as against the common council. “Where two or more defendants unite in demurring to a complaint, * * * it must be overruled if the complaint states a good *972cause of action against any one of the parties jointly demurring.” (6 Ency. of PI. & Pr. 321; People v. Mayor, 28 Barb. 240, 251; Holmes v. Seaboard Portland Cement Co., 63 Misc. Rep. 82.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Lewis v. Clarke
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1914
Citation: 148 N.Y.S. 1126
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.