midpage

Lewis v. CaputoLewis v. Caputo

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 27, 2012
Versions:20 N.Y.3d 906
980 N.E.2d 527
956 N.Y.S.2d 478

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.

The Appellate Division incorrectly determined that defendant failed to provide a sufficient basis for establishing probable cause as a matter of law. While different inferences as to plaintiffs guilt or innocence of the underlying crime are possible, only one reasonable inference could be drawn from the facts regarding probable cause. Therefore, the issue was not one properly presented to the jury for determination (see Veras v Truth Verification Corp., 57 NY2d 947 [1982], affg for reasons stated at 87 AD2d 381 [1st Dept 1982]; cf. Smith v County of Nassau, 34 NY2d 18 [1974]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Lewis v. Caputo
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 27, 2012
Citations: 20 N.Y.3d 906; 980 N.E.2d 527; 956 N.Y.S.2d 478
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In