History
  • No items yet
midpage
Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.
100 Conn. 122
Conn.
1923
Check Treatment

This case was tried with the companion case of Samuel Kaufman against the same defendants. The matters discussed in that case are equally applicable here, with a single exception. The prohibition of recovery for failure to have a motor-vehicle registered is limited to the owner of the vehicle by the provisions of Chapter 400, § 61, of the Public *Page 123 Acts of 1921. Prior to the Act of 1917, the same prohibition applied equally to the operator of the motor-vehicle and the passenger in the motor-vehicle. The present statute does not bar the plaintiff passenger from recovery for the failure of Kaufman, the owner of the motor-vehicle, to have had it registered. Shea v. Corbett, 97 Conn. 141, 147, 115 A. 694.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Dec 13, 1923
Citation: 100 Conn. 122
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.