| City of New York Municipal Court | Dec 27, 1899

O’DWYER, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for injuries sustained by him through the negligence of the defendant while he was lawfully an occupant of one of the defendant’s cars. The plaintiff entered the car about 15 minutes before it left Cleveland, which was at 8:30 on the evening of October 5, 1896. He retired at about 9:30, and rose the next morning at about quarter to 6,—about an hour before the car was due at Cincinnati. He was proceeding from his berth at one end of the car towards the wash room, at the other end, and when halfway stumbled over a large valise which the defendant’s porter had knowingly permitted to remain in the aisle. The car was dimly lighted, and the first intimation the plaintiff had of the dangerous condition of this passageway was when he stumbled and fell and received the injuries complained of. He had the right to assume that the passage was safe, and the question of contributory negligence, therefore, was for the jury. Piper v. Railroad Co., 76 Hun, 44" court="N.Y. Sup. Ct." date_filed="1894-02-12" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/piper-v-new-york-central--hudson-river-railroad-5506111?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5506111">76 Hun, 44, 27 N. Y. Supp. 593. The plaintiff, while lawfully walking along the aisle of the defendant’s car, stumbled over a valise which obstructed the passage; and this dangerous condition of the aisle was known to the defendant prior *1114to the accident, and by it permitted to continue. Such derelictions of duty on the part of the defendant constitute‘negligence. Lycett v. Railway Co., 12 A.D. 326" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1896-07-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lycett-v-manhattan-railway-co-5181591?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5181591">12 App. Div. 326, 42 N.Y.S. 431" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1896-12-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lycett-v-manhattan-railway-co-5511039?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5511039">42 N. Y. Supp. 431. We have examined all the exceptions called to our attention, and find none that would require a reversal of this judgment.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.