40 Ala. 524 | Ala. | 1867
It is true that an ordinance of the convention of 1865 authorizes the courts to inquire into the consideration of a contract, and that the parties contracted to pay and receive Confederate treasury-notes in discharge of the contract; but this was permitted for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of the recovery, and not to defeat it in toto. For the former purpose, the evidence might have been admissible, but in no event for the latter. — Addison on Contracts, pp. 118, 811-2.
It only remains for us to say that there is no error in the record, of which appellant can complain, and that the judgment must be affirmed.