History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lesher v. Gehr
1 Dall. 330
Pa.
1788
Check Treatment
By the Court:

The Legislature before the Revolution prescribed no rules for the Supreme Court; but it is certainly vested with the powers of the King’s Bench and Common Pleas in England; and the practice has been, in general, governed by the same law. Hence, we find, that it was formerly thought necessary to proceed by Testatum in Pennsylvania; and although a contrary practice has lately obtained, it is without the opinion or sanction of the court.

We think, therefore, that this execution must be quashed; and in every future case of the same kind, let a Fi. fa. be filed in the Supreme Court, with a return of nulla bona; and then a term must intervene before the Testatum issues, in order to support the fiction.

The Execution quashed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lesher v. Gehr
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 15, 1788
Citation: 1 Dall. 330
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.