midpage
NOTES
Notes
Notes

Lerner v. BrinLerner v. Brin

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Nov 3, 1992
92-456
Versions:608 So. 2d 519
1992 WL 317831

Whitman, Wolfe & Gross, and Irving J. Whitman, Miami, for appellant.

Michael A. Bienstock, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a beneficiary under her mother‘s will, appeals a final judgment in favor of appellee determining that appellant exerted undue influence on her mother. We affirm.

Appellant contends that the trial court‘s findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Appellee asserts that the findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence.

Although one may have rachmones1 for appellant, the trial court‘s findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence, and as such, will not be disturbed on appeal. See Gegen v. Learey, 503 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1971).

Affirmed.

NOTES

Notes

Notes

1
[1] Yiddish. Rachmones: Pity, mercy, compassion. F. Kogos, Dictionary of Yiddish Slang and Idioms (Castlebooks 1967).

Case Details

Case Name: Lerner v. Brin
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 3, 1992
Citations: 608 So. 2d 519; 1992 WL 317831; 92-456
Docket Number: 92-456
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In