History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leonardo v. Grimming
740 So. 2d 580
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1999
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages, at a case management conference, the trial court instructed the parties to “set down” a hearing in ten days. After the ten days expired, and no hearing had been “set down,” the trial court dismissed the case without prejudice, which may be the equivalent of a dismissal with prejudice because of the statute of limitations. We reverse the order because it does not contain “an express finding of a willful or deliberate refusal to obey a court order” which is a requisite for the sanction of dismissal. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271, 1272 (Fla.1990). Nor do we think, even if there had been such a finding, dismissal would have been justified. Reversed.

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Leonardo v. Grimming
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 21, 1999
Citation: 740 So. 2d 580
Docket Number: No. 98-2820
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.