*1 Truly, Atty., F.T.C., E. J. B. James doing JOHNSON, individual Corkey, Counsel, F.T.C., an Earl O. Asst. Gen. Leo Scalp Hair and as Johnson Washing- business Kintner, Counsel, W. General Petitioner, Clinic, ton, C., respondent. D. for v. RIVES, and Before CAMERON COMMISSION, TRADE FEDERAL Judges. JONES, Circuit Respondent. 17411. No. PER CURIAM. Appeals Court of find no differences in fact States We such
United Fifth Circuit distinguish case from Mueller v. as this 21, Cir., May States, 1958, 1959. 262 5 F.2d United there adhere to the doctrines
443. We the The order of Commis- announced. 21, Rehearing July 1959. Denied and will is affirmed be enforced. sion Affirmed. dissenting. Judge,
CAMERON, Circuit La., McCain, Orleans, I. James New Rehearing denied; CAMERON, Cir- petitioner. for dissenting. Judge, cuit