History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leo Brisbane v. Food Lion, LLC
697 F. App'x 148
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leo Edward Brisbane, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leo Edward Brisbane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brisbane v. Food Lion, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00989-JFM (D. Md. May 5, 2017). We also deny Brisbane’s motion for costs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Leo Brisbane v. Food Lion, LLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 29, 2017
Citation: 697 F. App'x 148
Docket Number: 17-6687
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.