History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lentz's Estate
261 Pa. 530
Pa.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The findings of fact by the learned auditor were all based upon sufficient evidence, and were followed by correct legal conclusions. We have not been convinced that there is any error in his well considered report, which was properly approved by the court below. In dismissing these cross appeals nothing more need be said, unless it be to add that when W. P. Beeber was called as a witness generally by those now objecting to his competency, they made him a competent witness for either side for all purposes: Seip v. Storch, 52 Pa. 210; Bennett v. Williams, 57 Pa. 404.

Decree affirmed and appeals dismissed at the costs of the respective appellants.

Case Details

Case Name: Lentz's Estate
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 3, 1918
Citation: 261 Pa. 530
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 52, 53, 54 and 160
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.