5 Munf. 324 | Va. | 1817
January 21st, 1817.
pronounced the Court’s opinion as follows :
The Court, in consequence of a certificate from the Chancellor, filed among the papers, have inspected the Act of May, 1783, ch. 172, and considers it a part of the Record;
Note by the Reporter. The Court seems not to have considered it necessary to-make tlie Act of 1794, ch. 37, a part of the-Record, because the donation of the escheated lands from the Commonwealth to the College was not put in issue by the Answer, as was the right of the Trustees to sell. Indeed, the fact of that donation might well be considered, under the circumstances of the case, as admitted by the defendant.