Leggett v. Inhabitants of Plainfield

| N.J. | Feb 9, 1922

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should- be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tkgnchard, Bergen, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.