History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leganowicz v. Rone
240 A.D. 731
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The hearing before the division of licenses was not a judicial proceeding and the charges, therefore, were not protected by an absolute privilege. They may, however, have a qualified privilege. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Leganowicz v. Rone
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1933
Citation: 240 A.D. 731
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.